Who/What Should Be Nominated

Commentary by James Berardinelli
February 5, 1998

This year, I'm going to try hard to stay calm.

What am I talking about? you ask. I'm referring to the annual ritual of announcing the Academy Award nominations, something that happens every year around this time. Because numerous deserving individuals and films are inevitably neglected, I have been known to enter into long, blistering condemnations of the Academy and their nomination process. So I write this column beforehand to delineate my preferences. I'm fully aware that some of my nominees don't stand a chance in hell of being recognized by the Academy, but that doesn't bother me one bit. These are my nominations, and I'll give them to whom I damn well want to give them.

Unless there's a compelling reason to do otherwise, I'll restrict myself to five "nominees" in each category. These are in alphabetical order (except the "best scenes", which doesn't reflect an Oscar category anyway). Certain categories (screenplay, foreign language film, documentary, and picture) are presented without commentary, largely because I've already written about these ad nauseaum elsewhere, or because I didn't have much to say. For more on my choice of Best Picture, see my 1997 Top 20 -- the Top 5 are my choices in this category.


ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:


ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:


ACTRESS IN A LEAD ROLE:


ACTOR IN A LEAD ROLE:


DIRECTOR:


ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY:


ADAPTED SCREENPLAY:


FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM:


DOCUMENTARY:


PICTURE:


MOST MEMORABLE SCENES OF THE YEAR (in no particular order, and, yes, I know it's not an Oscar category):

Now, let's see if the Academy agrees with even a handful of these choices...


© 1998 James Berardinelli


Back Up